this post was submitted on 28 Jun 2023
9 points (100.0% liked)

Radio: Turn on. Tune in.

65 readers
1 users here now

Discussion of the AM/FM radio industry. Air-checks okay, No self-promotion, No "check out my songs", No "how do I fix my radio", and no listen to my internet only stream posts please......

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Are you passionate about the captivating world of radio broadcasting? Are you fascinated by the way music, news, and stories can travel through the airwaves and captivate millions of listeners? If so, you've come to the perfect place!

Radio: Turn on. Tune in. is dedicated to discussing all aspects of the AM/FM radio industry, including air-checks.

Whether you're an aspiring radio broadcaster, a seasoned industry professional, or simply an enthusiastic fan, this is the place for exchanging knowledge, experiences, and insights. Here, we can explore a wide range of topics, such as:

๐Ÿ”Š AM/FM Radio History: Delve into the rich history of radio broadcasting, from its humble beginnings to its evolution into a powerful cultural force.

๐Ÿ”Š Industry Trends: Stay up-to-date with the latest trends and innovations in the AM/FM radio industry, including the emergence of digital radio, podcasting, and streaming services.

๐Ÿ”Š Air-Check Analysis: Share and discuss fascinating air-check recordings, dissecting the techniques employed by radio hosts, analyzing their delivery, music selection, and the overall experience they create for their listeners.

๐Ÿ”Š Broadcasting Techniques: Explore the art of radio broadcasting, including voice modulation, storytelling, interviewing skills, and the use of sound effects to engage and entertain audiences.

๐Ÿ”Š Radio Nostalgia: Take a trip down memory lane and reminisce about classic radio shows, iconic DJs, and the cultural impact they had on society.

๐Ÿ”Š Industry News and Events: Stay informed about upcoming radio events, industry conferences, and new developments that shape the AM/FM landscape.

This is a collaborative space where we can learn from each other, ask questions, share anecdotes, and spark lively discussions. Let's connect with fellow radio enthusiasts, broadcasters, historians, and industry insiders who share our love for the magic of radio.

So, whether you have a burning question, an intriguing air-check to share, or simply want to engage in thoughtful conversations about the AM/FM radio industry, welcome! Together, let's celebrate the artistry, innovation, and impact of radio broadcasting.

Tune in, turn up the volume, and let the conversation begin! ๐ŸŽง๐Ÿ“ป

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] node815 3 points 2 years ago (3 children)

I do have a question to ask though - In Portland Oregon where I reside currently, they have what seems like a "Carrier wave" if you will, which sounds like a continued "metalic hum" sound and reacts sort of to the talk over in the pitch. Plays 24/7 even with music on some stations. I used to think it was to broadcast the textual data newish radios have, but even with a new car, you still hear it, so I don't think it's for that. It's super hard to describe. I've never heard it while streaming online so can't record it easily to demonstrate the sound.

[โ€“] voiceoverguy 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Can you record it on your phone from the car radio or something? You have me intrigued!

[โ€“] node815 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I will try, next time I'm in the car, but my car doesn't seem to give that as much (New 2023 model) I'll see if I can dig up an FM radio here and record and submit it. :)

[โ€“] node815 1 points 2 years ago

Believe it or not, it's hard to hear but I think this captured it best. It's a tin sound sort of behind the voice, I cut it off to make sure not to infringe on copyright. Not sure if this link will work or not, but here:

https://ufile.io/qb27anrz (12 second sound file) Right around the 1st 4 seconds of the clip you can hear it most pronounced.

If you know of a better way to embed in Lemmy, let me know.

load more comments (1 replies)