this post was submitted on 02 Jan 2024
32 points (94.4% liked)

Nix / NixOS

1465 readers
3 users here now

Main links

Videos

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (4 children)

Oh, that's easy -- that's utter bullshit. Article is generous, this is a blog post.

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago (3 children)

๐Ÿ˜‚ why do you believe that?

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Because I'm pretty active in the Nix community and have never seen a single anti-flakes comment anywhere. Plenty of people advocating for flakes, and those who don't use or understand flakes. But never anyone who actively dislikes them.

[โ€“] [email protected] -1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

OK, I see where you're coming from. You're interpreting "anti" as "dislike". Have you considered interpreting it as those who don't use and don't want to use flakes?

Just because there is disagreement, doesn't mean that it has to be tied to negative emotions like hate or dislike.

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

Well no, because that's not what "anti" means.

And one can absolutely use NixOS without using flakes, whether they're marked experimental or not. They're simply a way to make inputs declarative, rather than the nix-channel method which is imperative.

So there's no "disagreement" here either.