this post was submitted on 29 Jun 2023
17 points (73.0% liked)

Fediverse

28523 readers
604 users here now

A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, KBin, etc).

If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to [email protected]!

Rules

Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration), Search Lemmy

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ulu_mulu 24 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

I don't understand. Reddit is exactly the same, it has thousands of different subs, many with overlapping content, many duplicated because someone didn't like the mods, yet I don't recall people saying reddit was broken because of it.

Why is Lemmy suddenly broken just because people naturally do the same reddit thing here?

Can't we just ask for a feature like multi-reddit that lets users aggregate different subs into the same feeds (like sort of collections) instead of trying to reinvent the wheel?

[–] BoaPirate 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

i think it feels more broken because it has less content, communities have less subs. so it can feel like more repetition when you encounter dupplicated posts. also, if you use mobile version that has for example lemmy.ml and . world there is even more reposting most of my time at reddit i spend at my sub page and maybe once or twice encountered duplicates, hot page was different story

[–] ulu_mulu 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

But that's because people "abuse" crossposting, it's a people's problem, not a platform one.

[–] BoaPirate 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

agree its still new platform to most of us, we will see what becames of it

[–] ulu_mulu 3 points 1 year ago

Yeah, we just need to give lemmy time to grow, reddit wasn't done in a day either.

load more comments (2 replies)