weirdway

70 readers

1 users here now

weird (adj.)

c. 1400,

• "having power to control fate", from wierd (n.), from Old English wyrd "fate, chance, fortune; destiny; the Fates," literally "that which comes,"

• from Proto-Germanic wurthiz (cognates: Old Saxon wurd, Old High German wurt "fate," Old Norse urðr "fate, one of the three Norns"),

• from PIE wert- "to turn, to wind," (cognates: German werden, Old English weorðan "to become"),

• from root wer- (3) "to turn, bend" (see versus).

• For sense development from "turning" to "becoming," compare phrase turn into "become."

OVERVIEW

This is a community dedicated to discussing subjective idealism and its implications. For a more detailed explanation, please take a look at our vision statement.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

syncretik

Scew

Discussion Thread (www.reddit.com)

submitted 1 year ago by syncretik to c/weirdway

24 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Talk more casually about SI here without having to make a formal post.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] syncretik 1 points 1 year ago (4 children)

[deleted]

Originally commented by u/[deleted] on 2018-10-24 03:23:09 (e8ayx8y)

[–] syncretik 1 points 1 year ago (3 children)

If I perceive something but then someone else perceives something then what makes the minds perceive the same things.

There are infinitely many possible answers to this question, and they are all as true or false as you believe them to be.

I'd like to question the question: what makes you so sure that there are other minds that perceive the same things you do?

Originally commented by u/VLSIHeaven on 2018-10-28 10:24:19 (e8kny2b)

[–] syncretik 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

[deleted]

Originally commented by u/[deleted] on 2018-10-28 11:22:26 (e8kr82c)

[–] syncretik 1 points 1 year ago

But then wouldn't that be objectivly true?

I don't know what "objectively true" means. How can I assign meaning to this notion?

I assign meaning to the notion of "truth" in various ways, depending on the context. As an example, when I'm discussing the weather with another person, I have a way to confirm or disconfirm statements about the weather. It's raining if water falls from the sky in small droplets. In our realm at present, this is a conventional way of dealing with truth: I "check" it using evidence from (my) sense perceptions. But it is no less subjective and volitional than any other ways of dealing with the notion of truth.

Originally commented by u/VLSIHeaven on 2018-10-29 07:13:28 (e8mee1b)

load more comments (1 replies)