this post was submitted on 15 Dec 2023
-14 points (18.2% liked)

Vegan

311 readers
2 users here now

An online space for the vegans of Lemmy.

Rules and miscellaneous:

  1. We take for granted that if you engage in this community, you understand that veganism is about the animals. You either are vegan for the animals, or you are not (this is not to say that discussions about climate/environment/health are not allowed, of course)
  2. No omni/carnist apologists. This is not a place where to ask to be hand-holded into veganims. Omnis coddling/backpatting is not tolerated, nor are /r/DebateAVegan-like threads
  3. Use content warnings and NSFW tags for triggering content
  4. Circlejerking belongs to /c/vegancirclejerk
  5. All posts should abide by Lemmy's Code of Conduct

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Note: It's become clear to me that so far the vegan community on Lemmy (unlike Reddit) is lacking and overrun by non-vegans. So please only answer this if you're actually vegan. I'm seeking a vegan perspective on this.

With that out of the way, is it speciesist to have a favourite animal? Many vegans consider themselves dog ๐Ÿ• lovers or cat ๐Ÿˆ lovers ("ailurophiles") first and foremost, aside from animal lovers (who actually respect animals hence their veganism) in general. Others, like Joey Carbstrong, say that pigs ๐Ÿ– are their favourite animal and always have been even since before they went vegan; maybe some saw the movie "Babe" and developed an affection for them, for example. It's understandable. And others like cows ๐Ÿ„ or chicks ๐Ÿฅ or lambs ๐Ÿ‘ of course.

But as much as it might be a natural thing to gravitate to a certain species of animal, and "favouritise" them, is that still a form of speciesism? Of course if you're not actually exploiting the animals that aren't your favourite then it's only a mental matter. But is it still wrong even just to view them differentially and prefer or hold more love for some species than others? Loving an individual than another makes sense. But would you love one race of people more than other? Do you say "Greek people are my favourite race" (as a non-Greek person, for sake of example)? If not, and if that would be considered racist, then why is it not speciesist to prefer one species over others, even if just mentally?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] [email protected] 8 points 11 months ago (13 children)

You can call it speciesism if you want, but fish are just not quite as cuddly as cats. So if you like a pet thats cuddly, you will prefer cats over fish and admitting that is in no way problematic.

Equating speciesism with racism also doesn't make a lot of sense to me. Species do exist in nature, they are hard boundaries which animals can breed. Races on the other hand are a made-up concept with no biological basis, used to distinguish between similar-looking groups within a species.

A fish and a cat cannot breed, as they are different species. A british shorthair and a sphynx on the other hand can, as the distinction is entirely artificial.

Racism is the wrong belief that races, like species are a biological concept that can be found in nature.

Speciesism differs from that, because different species do exist. For any two individual animals you can always determine if they belong to the same species, which isn't true for races. Animals of the same species do share traits, while there are differences between animals of different species.

In my opinion, pretending that every living being is the same would be way more problematic than what you call speciesism.

[โ€“] Grapetruth 1 points 11 months ago (4 children)

There is no need to believe that every species is the same in order to treat them all as well and as equally as possible.

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago (3 children)

The point is though, treating them all equally doesn't make any sense because based on their species they have different needs.

Some animals enjoy the company of humans, others do not. Some radiate a calmness that is appealing to some, while others have an enthusiasm that more fits other personalities. So when getting a pet, why would you ignore all that?

Should I get a crocodile as a pet just to treat them all the same? I wouldn't be doing that crocodile any favour, nor myself.

I guess its that old "equality vs equity" debate all over again.

[โ€“] Grapetruth 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Sorry I missed this comment.

Treating them all as equally well as possible makes sense, to be clear. That means not exploiting or harming any of them unnecessarily.

But treating them in exactly the same way doesn't, since they have different needs and considerations as you point out. I agree with that.

And I'm not saying we should have all animals as pets, in fact due to the suffering it causes I would be wholly against the domestication of any more animals.

But we don't have to treat animals in the same exact ways in order to respect and love them equally, even remotely or conceptually, even just based on the knowledge of them. It does feel strange to me to say "this species is my favourite species". Is it speciesist? I'm not sure. It's definitely not as bad as exploiting species selectively. But it might have some remnant of the views that led to those practices in the first place, potentially. I'm conflicted about it like another vegan said here whose comment was deleted.

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I guess that I disagree with the notion that it's bad to feel a certain way. We cannot control how we feel, only how we act.

And frankly its just unrealistic to ask people to love mosquitos just as much as they love cats.

I don't need to love an animal to acknowledge their capability to suffer and to try to avoid causing any suffering to that animal.

[โ€“] Grapetruth 1 points 11 months ago

I respect your endeavours I guess... regardless of your reasoning

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)