this post was submitted on 03 Dec 2023
15 points (89.5% liked)

SpaceX

1887 readers
43 users here now

A community for discussing SpaceX.

Related space communities:

Memes:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

I cannot express just how much I want this to happen.

No attempt = hubble will fail and reenter

Attempt(failure) = same

Attempt(success) = hubble continues groundbreaking science and, after some time, can be brought back to earth via Starship to become a museum piece that inspires generations!!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago (7 children)

I mean, Elon did put his Tesla into orbit out to Mars. A PR boost to save one of the most beloved science projects sounds like a winner after the crap he's been pulling with x.com fka twitter.

[–] Zippy 3 points 10 months ago (6 children)

Not sure his rockets have the ability to bring back a large and heavy load. Currently the landing of the first stage requires an empty vessel and the second stage certainly does not have the capability. He would need to engineer a brand new rocket to do just this.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago (4 children)

The starliner configuration is designed to take 100 people into leo and back. I think that alone could be close to the 12 tons that Hubble weighs. It'll be interesting to see capabilities when the variants are produced, specifically the cargo version for me.

[–] n00b001 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

It would be great if/when that happens, but it's a few years off the Elon deadline ATM, and doesn't look close to operation soon

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago

I think the current mission being explored is docking a dragon trunk and boosting it and servicing it. That could buy us enough time until starship cargo is ready. STS-125 added a docking port for capture, which is going to be used by a satellite to deorbit if it comes time to do that.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)