this post was submitted on 29 Nov 2023
19 points (100.0% liked)

Gnome

1747 readers
38 users here now

The GNOME Project is a free and open source desktop and computing platform for open platforms like Linux that strives to be an easy and elegant way to use your computer. GNOME software is developed openly and ethically by both individual contributors and corporate partners, and is distributed under the GNU General Public License.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago (7 children)

@petsoi

"Varia supports some basic functionality you'd expect, such as resuming incomplete downloads upon relaunch, but right now doesn't support saving files outside of your default download directory. I want to change this in the future while still having a minimal set of permissions with Flatpak."
giantpinkrobots on github

Big game changer for me is that it doesn't support saving files outside of the default download directory. Anything to do with 'Flatpak' is of a concern to me as well.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 7 months ago (2 children)

As someone who just started using Linux not so long ago, I'm just curious, why is anything to do with Flatpak a concern?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

@redimk

I'm an Arch user, so before I come across as disingenuous, I need to clarify that I just like to stick with 'pacman' as much as possible so that my install stays as "clean" as possible. Most of the time If I can't find something in pacman I can get it in the AUR. "Varia" isn't found in the AUR yet and in such cases I'll go to github and install it from there.

https://github.com/GCJMackenzie/Varia

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Interesting that my interpretation of a clean install is that there are as little packages messing with each other on the main install. Therefor an immutable distro is very good in this regard. Moreover, for a clean systme I prefer flatpaks. Packages that aren't available are installed via distrobox. Only system applications are allowed to mess with each other. A download manager isn't that close to the metal that I'd prefer installing it directly. Flatpak all the way.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

@juli

Fair enough, I guess each to his own. If you use a distro of your choice and apply a methodology that works for you, then far be it from me to tell you how to do it. Enjoy.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

From my perspective those things are also pretty political. E.g. Ubuntu ditched Flatpak in favor of their Snap solution. Snap has, compared to Flatpak only Ubuntu's proprietary store, where Ubuntu has full control over it. So it's also a fight about influence.

And it's breaking with traditional standards which people got used to and, as it's quite new, smaller things need still to be ironed out.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

@petsoi @redimk

As far as my understanding goes, regarding Ubuntu, is that they are going to ditch Snap completely with Ubuntu 24.04 LTS Naughty Nightingale.

Canonical has decided to abandon the Snap project and remove it completely in the upcoming release of 24.04 code-named, Naughty Nightingale.

[–] vbb 1 points 7 months ago

It isn’t true

load more comments (4 replies)