this post was submitted on 25 Nov 2023
26 points (96.4% liked)

C++

1721 readers
16 users here now

The center for all discussion and news regarding C++.

Rules

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 7 points 9 months ago (7 children)

In Rust, making something copyable is always explicit. I like that a lot.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago (4 children)

Copy has a very different meaning between the two languages. In rust the equivalent of a c++ copy is a clone() call for anything non trivial

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago (3 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

@BatmanAoD @Miaou It is just what you are used to.
In C++ everything is a copy. Sometimes the compiler optimizes it away. clang-tidy may help. Having a clone() is very C-like.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

That's a common idiom but the default behaviour is still implicit copy, which, with VLAs and no smart pointers, makes things arguably worse than in c++

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)