this post was submitted on 28 Oct 2023
9 points (71.4% liked)
WebDev
37 readers
1 users here now
founded 2 years ago
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Because everyone got a website by 2005, they still work, so why would I pay good money to replace something that works??
I think the point of the article (and I agree to that) is that "modern" websites (i.e. use heavy javascript frameworks) are having real issues that websites being built without loads of client-side javascript do not have. I guess some websites built in 2005 are performing better and are more accessible than websites being built today.
May I sooth you with a motherfucking website
Already know that one, probably my favourite website on the world wide web ;-)