this post was submitted on 09 Oct 2023
105 points (94.9% liked)

Asklemmy

43745 readers
1879 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy ๐Ÿ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Any games where a remaster could never stack up to the original.

Inspired by this post, asking the opposite, what games do you think are worthy of a remaster: https://lemmy.ml/post/6091201

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] [email protected] 65 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I would have said dead space until the remake came out and blew me away. So if the devs really care about it no game is untouchable to me. You can always play the original.

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Iโ€™d say the same thing about resident evil 2 and to an extent resident evil 3.

[โ€“] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think the re2+3 remakes are great games, but I don't think they're better than the originals. 3 especially felt really cut and dumbed down compared to it's source. I think I put 40 hours into the original story, and beat the remake in about 6.

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I agree that they are not better than the originals. I still prefer the tank controls.

load more comments (1 replies)