So an earlier post got me musing idly on the topic of integration between multiple federated services. Wouldn't it be nice to be able to integrate video hosting, discussions, microblogs, image sharing, and so on in beautiful seamless glory! Post a pic in Lemmy, it's automatically added to your Pixelfed album; upload a song to your NextCloud and people can see it in your funkwhale profile. That kind of thing.

One of the things that I figure will be useful reach that goal, I figure, is a form of federated identity management. Linking accounts can be done, but there would be a lot of advantages to having one account that knows where the different services you subscribe to are located, allowing the integration to happen seamlessly in the background.

And looking around, I see that it already exists as a concept, but I can't seem to find anyone discussing or implementing it in the Fediverse. For something that would solve a lot of problems, including decentralized (and self-controlled) identification, SSO, and account migration, it seems like something that everyone would be jumping on.

Am I missing something?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[+] [email protected] 0 points 2 years ago (2 children)

[deleted]

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

That's true. If you have one identity for everything, then it's trivial to collate your data. Maybe we can have a Do Not Track flag! That always works!

But seriously, that does open up an interesting topic on privacy in the fediverse in general. As it stands, it wouldn't be hard for an advertiser to open up a federated Lemmy instance and gather all kinds of data on every Lemmy instance, which could then be used for advertising on... what, Lemmy servers? I did read about some server reputation services people are working on to ban bot farms, so that might help there, but it's not a whole solution. Could something like that be extended to the ecosystem as a whole? But then how much responsibility for a person's privacy falls on the server operators versus themselves? Or in the end, would the benefits simply outweigh the risks, and we'd have to take the good with the bad, and people would just have to follow the usual rule of not putting anything on the Internet that you don't want the world to know? A lot of gray area there.

(Sorry for the train-of-thought posting style. I'm kinda imagining things as I go.)

[–] pca006132 2 points 2 years ago

Not very feasible I think. Our messages are basically broadcasts, so unless every server respect the privacy of their users and implement some kind of rate limiting, otherwise the data will still be public. I think privacy issue will require regulation instead of a technical solution.