this post was submitted on 19 Jun 2023
350 points (99.4% liked)

Programmer Humor

32581 readers
1127 users here now

Post funny things about programming here! (Or just rant about your favourite programming language.)

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It's been ages since I did IT. If I had a user who wanted to run Linux then I knew that, on average, they were going to cause me a lot less headaches with random user issues so I wouldn't mind being flexible. Endpoint security will be different, but a lot of network security is handled through network devices that don't care what the client is.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If I had a user who wanted to run Linux then I knew that, on average, they were going to cause me a lot less headaches with random user issues

In my case, it's the IT team which creates more issues for Linux users.

Whenever they change security policies, they never test it out on Linux and our connection goes down (some VPN/Firewall/DNS policy). It takes ages for us Linux users to convince them that we didn't do any changes on our system and this problem is on their side.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

I'm so glad to be away from corporate IT and working with small teams of highly technical people where every request isn't "ok I'll fill out the paperwork" but "Hmm, we could do it like this: " We just created a small network, gapped from everything else, where you can just use the bandwidth but cannot possibly affect the production network. Since our bandwidth utilization is generally around 5% of maximum it's not issue to grab things using a 10Gb chunk of a few hundreds of Gb of bandwidth. The traffic is tagged with a low priority QOS packet so even in the worst case it will never affect network operation.

[–] Arbiter 0 points 1 year ago

The solution is simple, all users must now use Linux.

No more it trouble :)