this post was submitted on 19 Jun 2023
169 points (100.0% liked)

World News

39145 readers
3552 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They had waterproof smartphones before this idiocy of non-replacable batteries. Ten years ago!

Just some examples:

Sony Xperia Active (2011)

Samsung Galaxy S5 (2014)

Today's smartphones are built cheap. Sadly. Louis Rossmam explains this well.

[–] GaryPonderosa 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Waterproofing was more difficult with replaceable batteries. It was a feature you paid extra for.

[–] 2ZR_FXE 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Was it?

So many years have passed since that phone came out.

Manufacturers had more than enough time to do something right besides just being water resistant.

[–] GaryPonderosa -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yes, it was. A piece that is removable by nature does not seal as well as one that is.