this post was submitted on 08 Jun 2023
6 points (100.0% liked)

networking

2779 readers
1 users here now

Community for discussing enterprise networks and the ensuing chaos that comes after inheriting or building one.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Looked down at my ThinkPad dock to plug in a USB device and saw a 10 next to it. USB.org has specs on a 10Gbps serial bus.

Time to trash the network. I'm getting a 10Gbps 24-port USB hub. :D

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] celerate 2 points 2 years ago (4 children)

Thunderbolt can create a network link between computers. A co-worker and I tried it out and we are excited to test what transfer speeds we can get with it.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Ya know, it's sorta funny that this kind of connectivity is what started 'workgroup' networks... ThickNet, ThinNet, etc. Ring topology is a good idea until you mix people and their computers in!

[–] celerate 3 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I'm frustrated that wired networking equipment faster than one gigabit is still expensive. My employer at the time upgraded to Gigabit equipment in 2016. Since then we have been on Gigabit. It's sad to me that even today 2.5 Gbps network equipment is uncommon.

[–] splenetic 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

For the vast majority of users, particularly corporate users, anything over 1Gbps is unnecessary. A lot of people spend their entire working day in a web browser and/or a VDI client plus something like Teams Slack or Zoom. For those use-cases bandwidth is less important than latency and higher network speeds don't have a huge impact on latency.

I work at a university and we're probably going to go to 2.5Gbps for our next network refresh in a year or two. The initial driver for that are the next-gen APs but we expect the engineering and media departments to notice the difference. The other 90+% of users will be oblivious.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)