PC Master Race

14995 readers

110 users here now

A community for PC Master Race.

Rules:

No bigotry: Including racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia, or xenophobia. Code of Conduct.
Be respectful. Everyone should feel welcome here.
No NSFW content.
No Ads / Spamming.
Be thoughtful and helpful: even with ‘stupid’ questions. The world won’t be made better or worse by snarky comments schooling naive newcomers on Lemmy.

Notes:

PCMR Community Name - Our Response and the Survey

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

434

Todd Howard asked on-air why Bethesda didn't optimise Starfield for PC: 'We did [...] you may need to upgrade your PC' (www.pcgamer.com)

submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/pcmasterrace

243 comments fedilink hide all child comments

lol. has anyone found ways to optimize starfield for their pc, like reducing stuttering, FPS drops, etc?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 61 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (15 children)

They didn't optimize it for consoles either. Series X has equivalent of 3060 RTX graphical grunt, yet it's capped to 30fps and looks worse than most other AAA games that have variable framerates up to 120fps. Todd says they went for fidelity. Has he played any recent titles? The game looks like crap compared to many games from past few years, and requires more power.

The real reason behind everything is the shit they call Creation Engine. An outdated hot mess of an engine that's technically behind pretty much everything the competition is using. It's beyond me why they've not scrapped it - it should have been done after FO4 already.

[–] stigmata 19 points 1 year ago

Weird how everyone jokes how shitty Bethesda developers are but everyone's surprised how bad Starfield runs.

load more comments (14 replies)