this post was submitted on 19 Aug 2023
43 points (93.9% liked)

Starfield

2848 readers
1 users here now

Welcome to the Starfield community on Lemmy.zip!

Helpful links:

Spoiler policy:

Post & comment spoiler syntax:

<spoiler here>

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

While excitement and anticipation for a new game are natural, overhyping can be detrimental to the overall experience. When expectations become too inflated, the actual game might struggle to meet them, leading to disappointment among players. Overhyping can create unrealistic assumptions about gameplay, graphics, and features, which can result in players feeling let down even if the game is objectively good. It's important to maintain a balanced perspective, allowing the game to be enjoyed for what it is rather than what it was overhyped to be.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago (8 children)

Reminding yourself of Fallout 76 should help cool down the hype.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (7 children)

@Hanabie @ArchmageAzor
Fallout 76 was intended to be a MMORPG, i guess, due to a MMO hype. But Bethesda has a lot of single player RPG fans because Bethesda published sccessful series like TES and FO. They tried to throw single players into a MMO game, it was a bad idea but i believe that's a lesson learned.

[–] Chailles 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

And 76 wasn't all that bad. There were a lot of really great elements in it that, had 76 instead been a single player game (or at the most a co-op game), it'd have been much more well received.

The world was fun, the new monsters are cool, the combat was basically the same as FO4.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

@Chailles
Yeah, i heard the last updates containing more story (or story at all?) made it a very good game.
I would try it if i still didn't have FO4 on my pile of shame. Finished FONV last May (i started gaming in 2020 after several years of pause).

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)