/kbin meta

639 readers

1 users here now

Magazine dedicated to discussions about the kbin itself. Provide feedback, ask questions, suggest improvements, and engage in conversations related to the platform organization, policies, features, and community dynamics. ---- * Roadmap 2023 * m/kbinDevlog * m/kbinDesign

founded 2 years ago

Are we 'Shadowbanned' from beehaw? (kbin.social)

submitted 2 years ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

67 comments fedilink hide all child comments

There was a post about how beehaw was defederating from shitjustworks and lemmy.world about 6 hours ago. Are we involved in that, as are we a subset of lemmyworld?

https://beehaw.org/post/567170

How does this affect us? I still see beehaw posts on my 'all' page, but any content I engage with is effectively visible, I want to be sure

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I'm just not super strong on the whole fediverse concept, apologies friend

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 years ago

It's like The Force: You need a certain concentration of fedichlorians before you can gain an understanding.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Each website is independent from each other. They merely have the potential to automatically mirror content from other websites made using compatible software.

So lemmy.ml, lemmy.one, lemmy.world, lemmy.ca, etc. are all totally different websites that run Lemmy. Being different websites, they have totally different admins, and have different rules.

Meanwhile, kbin.social, kbin.run, kbin.place, kayb.ee, fedia.io, and readit.buzz, are totally different websites that run kbin. They similarly have totally different admins, and different rules.

Lemmy (the software) and kbin (the software) use the same communication language, so they can exchange content, but they're still being used by totally separate websites.