this post was submitted on 15 Jun 2023
109 points (99.1% liked)

/kbin meta

639 readers
1 users here now

Magazine dedicated to discussions about the kbin itself. Provide feedback, ask questions, suggest improvements, and engage in conversations related to the platform organization, policies, features, and community dynamics. ---- * Roadmap 2023 * m/kbinDevlog * m/kbinDesign

founded 1 year ago
 

See Beehaw's Post to find out why

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (9 children)

The beehaw admins have stated their hopeful end goal would be a federation whitelist, rather than the current blacklist format. So even if you were to make you own / join a smaller instance it seems like beehaw's entire goal is to be walled off from most instances.

[–] CodingAndCoffee 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

That is a very good point. I'm such a situation the only two choices are to make their community your home and play by their rules (what many of us just left Reddit over) or ignore it and interact with the content and communities you can.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (3 children)

okay by their rules (what many of us just left Reddit over)

People are leaving Reddit over their moderation rules? I thought the CEO did something with the API.

But I mean, yeah, people who have compatible instance rules will federate and the people on those instances will have agreed to those rules. I think you might be overestimating how restrictive typical rules are, unless you think transphobia being called "not okay" is too restrictive.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

People are leaving Reddit over their moderation rules? I thought the CEO did something with the API.

I think it's fair to consider the Reddit admins making unilateral decisions that drastically alter how users can use the platform as "their rules".

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)