this post was submitted on 03 Aug 2023
895 points (84.0% liked)

Memes

46849 readers
1990 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] -3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (13 children)

Like who? Making an actual living I mean, not just collecting small donations to 'buy them a coffee' or whatever.

Not saying you're wrong, but some examples would be welcome.

Edit: Down voting me for asking a question, lol. Way to demonstrate your dedication to that free and open philosophy you apparently advocate for, folks.

[–] itsJoelle 11 points 2 years ago (4 children)

See: RedHat devs and all the FOSS orgs that actually pay devs to work on their shit.

Google, Meta, and AMD have people on their to team they pay for development on FOSS projects because their operations rely upon them, so they have a vested interest in maintaining them.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

So the best solution to make a living as a FOSS developer is to... Work for some giant tech monopoly who engages in sketchy consumer practices on a regular basis?

AFAIK Sync was created by a single person, so I doubt he's getting paid by anyone other than fans of the app and ad revenue. I'll look into RedHat though, I appreciate you taking the time to provide an actual example.

[–] itsJoelle 6 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Not a problem. Also FOSS orgs pay their devs as well. Off the top of my head OS developers with a large userbase often pay their devs through donations to foundations that fund the project. Often donors are companies as well, but it gives a developer the option to get paid without working for a massive company.

(I suppose indirectly they do, but that's a whole different ball of wax)

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)