this post was submitted on 31 Jul 2023
188 points (91.6% liked)

Twitter

629 readers
3 users here now

An unofficial Twitter Community: The Good, the Bad and the Ugly!

Rules

  1. Be respectful and inclusive.
  2. No harassment, hate speech, or trolling.
  3. Engage in constructive discussions.
  4. Share relevant content.
  5. Follow guidelines and moderators' instructions.
  6. Use appropriate language and tone.
  7. Report violations.
  8. Foster a continuous learning environment.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] IverCoder -3 points 1 year ago (14 children)

Wouldn't this building be Elon's property, what stops them from changong their own markings as they please? (I'm not familiar with American property stuff.)

[โ€“] BadAdvice 4 points 1 year ago

First, the city "owns" all the land everything is built on. If the city doesn't like something, they just eminent domain your shit and change it. Second, a lot of old buildings in SF are "historic" buildings, which is a legal classification that means either the building itself or an event in the buildings past has enough historic value to preserve for future generations. This means the building is protected from change in a whole bunch of very complicated and specific ways. Replacing a sink faucet or light fixture generally takes months of inspections, board review, and other bureaucratic nonsense. I can't imagine the amount of work that was supposed to have been done before either the old sign was taken down or the new one was put up, but I'm pretty sure muskymoo didn't bother.

load more comments (13 replies)