this post was submitted on 14 Jun 2023
20 points (100.0% liked)

Programming

3347 readers
1 users here now

All things programming and coding related. Subcommunity of Technology.


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Microsoft is breaking its open and extension-friendly ethos with VSCode in order to cripple GitHub Copilot competitors with restricted APIs.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (6 children)

Eh idk if it's for copilot, but the play is pretty standard for Microsoft lately. Give the base away for free and charge for the cream on top.

Windows is free now because they know now you're in the ecosystem, you'll pay for office, one drive, SharePoint, etc. Vscode is the same.

He'll look at halo infinite. Free to play, but once you're in they want you to buy the thousand add ons.

Nothing is ever free, everything has a catch

[–] sergiu 2 points 1 year ago (3 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Generally they don't care, they want you in the ecosystem. I don't know if they explicitely label it as free, but you can download an ISO, install it, and log in and I believe you're good to go now. Or if you have any Windows 7-10 key I believe they are honored. (Someone call me out if I'm wrong, it's been a while since I installed Windows). But I don't think they care at all anymore, I think it's been more about bringing people into their platform.

What's better for Windows? a 1 time purchase of $99 or give that away for free then charge $150/year for Office?

[–] KerPop47 1 points 1 year ago

Haa been for decades iirc. Windows is free, but customization features are locked behind a license. I remember my dad's Windows XP being unlicensed, and the biggest issue was just a notification in the bottom corner.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

No, it isn't. They just gave free upgrades from 7 to 10 and 10 to 11.

load more comments (2 replies)