1204
this post was submitted on 26 Jul 2023
1204 points (89.4% liked)
Malicious Compliance
19246 readers
2 users here now
People conforming to the letter, but not the spirit, of a request. For now, this includes text posts, images, videos and links. Please ensure that the “malicious compliance” aspect is apparent - if you’re making a text post, be sure to explain this part; if it’s an image/video/link, use the “Body” field to elaborate.
======
-
We ENCOURAGE posts about events that happened to you, or someone you know.
-
We ACCEPT (for now) reposts of good malicious compliance stories (from other platforms) which did not happen to you or someone you knew. Please use a [REPOST] tag in such situations.
-
We DO NOT ALLOW fiction, or posts that break site-wide rules.
======
Also check out the following communities:
[email protected] [email protected]
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
So you do think there is a patriarchy? And you think it is based on fact, not the social construction of gender?
So, you think you live in a society where discrimination based on sex does not exist.
Where is that, and what is your evidence for your claim?
The story is about Italy?
You didn't give your evidence so perhaps you'd prefer to refute this? Patriarchy in disguise — the myth of gender equality in the Netherlands
Bullshit.
You probably missed my edit. You didn't give evidence for your position so I've asked you to refute evidence for mine, just to make it nice and simple for you.
So, you think when bad laws go away, the attitudes behind them disappear as if by magic?
The article gives up-to-date statistics as well as the dates of various laws. If you think those statistics are wrong, or don't demonstrate what the authors say they do, you can explain. Or admit that your opinion is rooted in abject ignorance of the world you live in. Either will do.