this post was submitted on 14 Jun 2023
7 points (100.0% liked)

Discussions related to Infosec.pub

1124 readers
7 users here now

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

@infosecpub testing posting from #mastodon

Testing, testing, 1, 2, 3...

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (11 children)

@infosecpub Seems like a potential usability disaster imo. If people wise up to the ability to post to Lemmy instances (or infosec.pub specifically if the issue is isolated to that instance) from Mastodon than anyone who's using Lemmy natively won't be able to interact with that post. There's no way of really easily seeing that it is of Mastodon origin outside inspecting the OP's user info (which will denote I came from infosec.exchange). You can, as the OP respond to reply threads but for standard reply-ee's you can only see/respond to the reply threads you started.

For those who don't want to have separate identities across all these Fediverse services I can see the attraction of the cross-posting from Mastodon--> Lemmy but this is def an issue.

@jerry not sure if this is something tweakable on the Lemmy server either fixing the ability to respond to Mastodon-originated posts within Lemmy or disabling the ability to do this from Mastodon completely until it is sorted out by the Lemmy devs.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

@shellsharks @infosecpub sadly, there are no such options in lemmy or mastodon

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

@jerry @infosecpub

@lemmyworld‬ users seem to be able to do this. Not sure how much effort you feel like putting into infosec.pub but enabling the ability to reply from Lemmy to mastodon originated posts seems huge.

Haven’t tried all of this with #kbin / #fedia yet so stay tuned…

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

@shellsharks @infosecpub @lemmyworld I will look into it, but there are quite literally no options to either enable or block this in lemmy.

load more comments (8 replies)