this post was submitted on 26 Jul 2023
139 points (92.1% liked)

Ukraine

8317 readers
309 users here now

News and discussion related to Ukraine

*Sympathy for enemy combatants is prohibited.

*No content depicting extreme violence or gore.

*Posts containing combat footage should include [Combat] in title

*Combat videos containing any footage of a visible human must be flagged NSFW

Server Rules

  1. Remember the human! (no harassment, threats, etc.)
  2. No racism or other discrimination
  3. No Nazis, QAnon or similar
  4. No porn
  5. No ads or spam (includes charities)
  6. No content against Finnish law

Donate to support Ukraine's Defense

Donate to support Humanitarian Aid


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Relo 4 points 1 year ago (14 children)

I hope there will be a time when we talk about American, European, African and Asian war crimes. But the article is about the investigation of russian war crimes.

So let's focus on this topic for now.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (13 children)

"The Pentagon had been resistant to the move and privately argued that any cooperation with the court could open the way for politicized prosecution of American troops deployed overseas."

"Republican and Democratic lawmakers have accused the Pentagon of effectively undermining war crimes prosecution of Russia by blocking the sharing of U.S. military intelligence with the ICC."

This article is literally (as in I quoted this directly from the article) about the US Pentagon refusing to cooperate with the ICC as any cooperation could be seen as legitimization when the ICC goes after US war criminals.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (10 children)

Would say it is fair to bring up the US refusal to recognize the ICC (we are on Ukraine community so slightly offtopic but no fuzz) but do you have anything to say about the investigation of Russian war crimes which this presumably will help with? Also your rhetoric is such that it sounds like you want to minimize them while trying to claim the US is "harboring so many".

[–] Relo 1 points 1 year ago

Thank you! Couldn't have said it better.

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)