this post was submitted on 25 Jul 2023
1237 points (98.8% liked)

Firefox

17301 readers
443 users here now

A place to discuss the news and latest developments on the open-source browser Firefox

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (9 children)

That’s not true - you can still use ad blockers etc as normal.

It’s also not a browser check, it’s a device check. It’s to check that the device can be trusted, like android itself hasn’t been tampered with.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

That's equally stupid though... why shouldn't I be able to tamper with my phone's operating system? And how is it any of a website's business if I do?

[–] [email protected] -5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You can tamper all you want, but apps can already block access to devices that have been tampered with. This just gives that same power to websites.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

... yes, and I am obviously very against giving that same power to websites lol. An app is built from the ground up as a UX created by the company, and that is what you are signing up for when you use an app. A browser should be a contained way of rendering data from some webserver according to a user's preferences. Google is apparently trying to "app-ify" web protocols in order to give themselves more power over a user's experience to the detriment of the user.

load more comments (6 replies)