this post was submitted on 15 Jul 2023
70 points (94.9% liked)

The Signal messenger and protocol.

1408 readers
1 users here now

https://signal.org/

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Not sure if any of you have encountered the same resistance to using Signal. Some of my cousins refused to use Signal because they are already using "too many chat apps" (e.g. WhatsApp, Facebook Messenger, WeChat, Telegram, Line, Snapchat, etc.). To them, Signal will just be another chat app among their numerous other chat apps. I understand that jumping between so many messaging apps imposes some kind of cognitive and maintenance burden. What are some ways to convince such people to use Signal?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 35 points 1 year ago (7 children)

It was a lot easier to convince people (and myself) to use signal when it also did SMS. When that feature was removed it certainly felt like another app to worry about.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago (5 children)

The loss of SMS really diminished Signal's attractiveness as a messaging app. I still use it because moving the few that I have convinced to employ it as a vector for communication to something more obscure would be even more tiresome.

[–] Tangent5280 1 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Any idea why signal removed the SMS feature?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Basically, supporting SMS and MMS didn't align with their commitment to privacy and security.

https://signal.org/blog/sms-removal-android/

[–] Tangent5280 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's kind of sad, but I suppose they have a point.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Yeah, a bad one - a hyper-secire app that no one uses doesn't exactly advance secure communications. That plus wasting dev hours on stories are the dumbest moves I've seen the org take and sure enough, all my friends who really only used signal for a few group chats dropped it all together with the SMS change.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)