this post was submitted on 12 Mar 2025
6 points (100.0% liked)

Monde

476 readers
25 users here now

Bienvenue sur Monde, une communauté francophone dédiée à l'actualité et la culture internationale.

Le week-end, sous le pseudo de @[email protected] je posterais un peu de culture, histoire de faire une pause sur l'actualité internationale. :)

Merci de respecter les Règles de l'instance jlai.lu


Comment lire toute la presse pour 25€/an : le pass BNF

Presse et média

Actualités positive

Fediverse


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] stevestevesteve 3 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I feel like including ANYTHING aws-hosted muddies this up a fair bit. None of the other 5 are really hosting companies (and it sounds like they didn't block azure cloud or Google cloud? Not sure. They also certainly can't tell if something is AWS backed but behind cloudflare or other reverse proxies).

It's kind of like if they refused to go into a physical store because that store relies on AWS services to operate. Sure, that has ramifications of its own, but it's vastly different from using the services directly on your own, especially compared to, say, not using YouTube because alphabet owns it. Limiting the block to big-5 OWNED user-facing services would be much more interesting (and feasible) to me.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I find it interesting to follow through with the approach. It still shows the sprawling influence of AWS and their monopoly.

[–] stevestevesteve 1 points 1 week ago

It sure does, but to an extent that overshadows the influence of the other blocked services.