this post was submitted on 22 Feb 2025
64 points (97.1% liked)
Firefox
4505 readers
168 users here now
A community for discussion about Mozilla Firefox.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
That may also potentially be survivorship bias. IMO the only open source projects that would live to tell the tale are:
At least two of those categories are reliant on funding from companies, which in turn relies on either their well-entrenched presence in their respective market, or their ability to market themselves effectively (ex, via advertising).
This is again vague wordage. What does this mean exactly?
That's understandable, primarily I would define it as being in active development that ensures it remains at least functional (for example, compatible with modern versions of their target platforms), since the main way I see projects failing is by lack of development for upkeep. One-and-done projects are possible, but change is the only constant, and factors beyond the project's control can make it non-functional