this post was submitted on 01 Feb 2025
-2 points (45.0% liked)
Spaceflight
752 readers
92 users here now
Your one-stop shop for spaceflight news and discussion.
All serious posts related to spaceflight are welcome! JAXA, ISRO, CNSA, Roscosmos, ULA, RocketLab, Firefly, Relativity, Blue Origin, etc. (Arca and Pythom, if you must).
Other related space communities:
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
Related meme community:
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Basically all of the first "small groups of pioneers" died, and Mars is a more hazardous place by orders of magnitude. No one who makes this comparison between establishing human settlements on Mars and the colonialist expansion on Earth should be taken seriously. It's like comparing diving to the bottom of the Mariana with going snorkeling in Hawaii.
And bluntly, Starship is a scam to extract taxpayer dollars from the government. It is not going to work. It is not intended to work. It is intended to look plausible enough to collect contract money and generate fanboyism to manipulate public opinion.
Sorry I haven't been able to watch the video you linked yet, but I thought the Wikipedia article was fascinating.
I'm curious what you mean by starship "working". They're seemingly close to booster reuse, upper stage recovery, going orbital, payload deployment, and propellant transfer. There's no fundamental reason the technology wouldn't work, right? Landing on the moon or Mars does seem like a challenge, but it's sort-of on the horizon. Return from Mars, however, now that really would be pretty crazy. Even so, doesn't this open-up new capabilities?