this post was submitted on 29 Jan 2025
20 points (95.5% liked)

Factorio

1223 readers
55 users here now

A Lemmy community for the game Factorio made by Wube Software.

Rules

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
dogpound
20
quality is very expensive (lemm.ee)
submitted 1 month ago by [email protected] to c/factorio
20 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

I started a second space age play thru. I felt it was a little fast so I upped research 5x. I also decided to embrace quality, as I barely touched it in play thru #1.

It's expensive. Let's just assume 10% quality. If you have 10% to get uncommon, then you have to make 10 to get 1. If you recycle the other 9, then you get 25% back and 10% of that can be quality. So you get roughly 2 normal back and 0.2 uncommon.

If you make 50, you get 5 on first run. On recycle, you get 1 uncommon and 10 normal back. So you can count those as -10 on the initial cost. Net result is 6 uncommon cost 40 normal.

Am I doing that math right?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yes, sounds about right. The most important thing with quality is making better quality modules.

Fulgora is great, quality recyclers, pull out high quality outputs and reserve for the future.

[โ€“] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

Thinking about it, yes, Fulgora is great for this. I was trying to do quality on Nauvis and it was so resource intense.