this post was submitted on 17 Jan 2025
571 points (93.7% liked)

Memes

47077 readers
1507 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (25 children)

1 isn't a war crimes lmao 2 isn't a war crime 3. Isn't a war crime nor is there proof. Literal unbacked western propaganda, wanna know what is backed? Gaza, By the west and Sudan genocide by America via UAE RIGHT NOW, you can literally watch it unfold on all social media 4. Perhaps, I would need to do more research on this one, but didn't you got 3 wrong, I wouldn't be surprised if your wrong again. 5. Not a war crime

Edit: no idea how to do formatting on the phone, I apologise

[–] Malek061 6 points 1 month ago (23 children)

Crimes against humanity are war crimes. Looting is a war crime. Invasion of a sovereign nation is an act of war. Stealing their resources is looting. Genocide is a crime against humanity and Tibet and the Uyghers are in one.

Wolf warriors that bury their head in the sand will suffocate under the lies.

China has been real bad.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago (13 children)

Uyghers are in one

There is no post-2021 evidence whatsoever of human right abuses of any sort in the Xinjiang province against Uyghur people. You can try to find stuff but you won't find anything, I dare you to send me a single article that has an actual reference to actual evidence of post-2021 human right abuses. Send me an article and point to the actual reference within the article. I dare you.

[–] Malek061 -3 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Uyghur Genocide and Concentrated Reeducation Camps in the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region of the People’s Republic of China https://search.app/fyMhR137LTgqVkEJ8

Here is a report from the office of national intelligence last November listing all the data for the genocide.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

The document is from a US intelligence agency from what it seems, it's poorly referenced, and even then there's nothing post-2021, is there?

I explicitly asked to please point at the reference within the article, because I'm exhausted of people just finding articles on google on this topic on western media and sending them to me without reading them. Please tell me what post-2021 huma right abuses are referenced and well-sourced in the report

[–] Malek061 -2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

You didn't download it did you? There is recent and relevant information about Uygher displacement and ethic cleansing. Why do you support ethnic cleansing?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago

Again: point out the exact reference in the "report", because I simply can't find it, I already asked you twice to do that.

Anyway, amazing that your argument is "look, Uyghur genocide is real. And here's the evidence: US intelligence state propaganda"

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

So I checked it out... never directly states where the data is from ("PRC state media and data", "party documents and data reportedly obtained from local public security bureaus in Xinjiang", it continues to be this vague never specific throughout), most of the dates end in 2021/2022 (for the latter e.g. "the last date for which authorities have issued such reports", so that doesn't show it hasn't ended in 2021)

The closest thing you have in there is

the continued elevated number of indictments in 2022 suggests that the campaign continues

Are there other, better, sources?

[–] Malek061 -4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Two years after Xinjiang findings, UN reports ‘limited access to information’, ‘reprisals’ against activists | ISHR https://search.app/rTPVgDbwvYQ9ozAEA

China is refusing to allow an investigation. That's a presumption of guilt.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I never heard of the ISHR. They seem to be cagey about their funding sources 🤔

The actual UN OHCHR report is a one-pager that provides no detail or evidence to back up its mention of “limited access” and “fear of reprisals”: https://www.ohchr.org/en/press-briefing-notes/2024/08/china-update-work-un-human-rights-office

Weak tea.

ETA: Looking deeper, the funding seems to mostly come from NATO & NATO “partner” governments and the Ford Foundation.

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (19 replies)
load more comments (20 replies)