this post was submitted on 14 Jan 2025
9 points (90.9% liked)
AusLegal
251 readers
1 users here now
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
They might call in an alternate juror who went through jury selection and has heard the same evidence, but doesn't participate in deliberations unless they replace an original juror.
[ Disclaimer: I'm an American Idiot although I assume reserve jurors are common practice for courts ]
Can confirm for the US at least, I was a backup juror a couple years ago in a rather dull civil case. It’s standard practice here to select 14 jurors so you have 12 plus two alternates. I sat and heard the whole case, then had lunch with the judge during deliberations where we chatted about how stupid the case was.
I suspect they might see it as their duty to point out legal stupidity; if only just so that the jurors are not given a bad impression of the whole legal system.