Stop Killing Games

119 readers

5 users here now

[EU] Stop Killing Games:

The grassroots movement to regulate that games be left in a playable state after publisher support ceases.

Petition

SKG Website

Discord

Milestones:

(40.51%) Petition

7/7 Countries reached.

Statistics

Current: 1,314 signatures weekly

Target: 21,245 signatures weekly

Safe Target: 28,388 signatures weekly

Goals:

(44.19%) of the signatures will be reached at this rate.

196 days / 28 weeks / 7 months left.

Final Day: 31/7/2025.

founded 2 months ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

All 27 nations listed in their percent number (02-January-2025). (lemmy.ca)

submitted 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

11 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago (8 children)

Have you read the sidebar?

[+] zorro -8 points 2 weeks ago (7 children)

No and I don't think I should be expected to tbh

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

That’s not a good response after someone was kind enough to help you.

[–] zorro 2 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Is it a bad response?

Ok maybe we back up here and assume I'm not evil and full of malice. I'm here scrolling through Lemmy reading things and I see all of this data that someone clearly put a lot of work into without any explanation. What's my engagement? How am I supposed to derive that the relevant info is (again I don't want to be mean) poorly explained in the sidebar? What if I wanted to send these stats to a friend?

I guess I'm sorry for being critical.

[–] 9tr6gyp3 2 points 2 weeks ago

Not gonna lie, I was also confused af. I thought this was country GDP or something lol

[–] LarsIsCool 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Sure, I will bite! Happy to assume no evil or malice and it is mostly down to a misunderstanding.

I think your original comment was fine. If we were to nitpick, it potentially could have used a compliment like "it looks very interesting" to clarify that it comes out of interest.

The response you got on this was, although a bit snarky, informative enough for you to find out more information about it. I assume you read the sidebar by now, as you stated you are not malicious.

If you were to want to respond by critiquing the post that it would have been helpful if this information was available closer to the post itself, I figure a comment as below would result in fewer downvotes:

"Thank you for your directions. I see now that it is about ... Interesting how ... I do think that it would be nice if some of this information was available in the post description, as this might further increase engagement from outsiders that are just browsing the Lemmy homepage".