this post was submitted on 02 Jan 2025
687 points (96.0% liked)

Microblog Memes

6665 readers
4660 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (31 children)

The first quarter of this century is over at the end of 2025.

2001 was the first year in this century. 2025 is the 25th year in this century. 2100 will be the 100th - and last - year in this century.

(1 was the first year in the first century, 100 was the 100th - and last - year in the first century. That's why every subsequent century starts on xx1 or xxx1 as well)

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (7 children)

That doesn't make much sense though, year 0 does exist. We define our calendar based on Jesus's supposed birth year, not his birth year+1. Or?

[–] PetteriSkaffari 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Only programmers start counting with 0. All the normal people start with 1.

[–] lurklurk 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

You mean normal people start at 0 and non-programmers sometimes start at 1?

How many apples are you holding right now? Is it less than 1? How would you count that?

[–] PetteriSkaffari 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

When I write that normal people start at 1 then I mean that normal people start at 1, funny enough. Also, I am currently holding 0 apples. No need to start counting.

[–] lurklurk 1 points 1 month ago

Sounds like you started counting at zero apples.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (28 replies)