this post was submitted on 30 Dec 2024
52 points (65.3% liked)

Showerthoughts

30117 readers
412 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. A showerthought should offer a unique perspective on an ordinary part of life.

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. Avoid politics
    • 3.1) NEW RULE as of 5 Nov 2024, trying it out
    • 3.2) Political posts often end up being circle jerks (not offering unique perspective) or enflaming (too much work for mods).
    • 3.3) Try c/politicaldiscussion, volunteer as a mod here, or start your own community.
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

But ask me about legalized weed ;]

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 days ago (7 children)
[–] leadore 2 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (6 children)

I saw no hostility except from you toward OP. Don't take it as a personal insult if someone isn't into smartphones as much as you are. Let's not treat attitudes towards phones as if they are attitudes towards the people who do or don't use them.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago (5 children)

Hostility doesn't have to be rude, just antagonistic. OP is dismissing everybody's valid points and just flat-out ignoring a bunch of them when it doesn't suit his preconceived point of view. That's literally the definition of antagonistic.

[–] leadore 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I guess it depends on how you take it, could be vice versa. I see a lot of posts that could be taken as other people dismissing OP's valid points that don't suit their preconceived points of view. Downvotes on most of OP's posts that aren't saying anything offensive, just expressing their POV.

Have we gotten to where everyone has to agree with the majority or they get piled on? Even if the opinions seem antagonistic to you, could that you be feeling personally attacked because you do like smartphones. They're just opinions of phones, not opinions of people who use them. It just seems weird how strongly people are reacting to someone who hasn't done anything wrong or insulted anyone, but is just not conforming to the norm.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Getting downvoted isn't getting piled on, it just means that people disagree with your post and OP made several antagonistic posts; of course people are gonna disagree. You're seeing violence where there is none.

[–] leadore 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

OK, you thought their opinions were antagonistic and we may have different definitions of antagonistic. But read the thread. There are a lot of aggressively antagonistic posts telling OP they're full of shit, lying, a troll, etc. Apparently they just couldn't believe someone didn't think their smartphone has made their life better, and attacked. Maybe I missed something, I didn't see any posts from OP calling anyone names, accusing anyone of lying, or telling anyone they're full of shit.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

Those responses are not because OP doesn't like smartphones, they're because people correctly called out their disingenuous bullshit. Imagine I make a post saying I can't think of a single way tractors have improved my life. People tell me all the ways tractors have improved everybody's lives and I go "well, I buy my vegetables from the supermarket so tractors are still useless to me". I'm basically announcing I'm not interested in having a good faith conversation and am just here to be antagonistic. People don't like that.

For example, I am being overtly hostile to OP and not to you, even though you're both arguing the same point. The difference is that you're doing it in good faith.

[–] leadore 2 points 4 days ago

OK, I just didn't take it as being an argument that smartphones were bad or that they haven't helped anyone. I took it as OP saying that having one hasn't benefited them personally, which I can understand and relate to, and is why I was defending that opinion (I explained my view about them in an earlier post in the thread). Anyway, no point in continuing since we just have different interpretations of what they were saying. Thanks for being polite about it and giving me a better idea of what some responders were upset about.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)