349
Activist says trans people can’t trust Democrats to protect them anymore
(www.independent.co.uk)
this post was submitted on 15 Dec 2024
349 points (93.5% liked)
United States | News & Politics
2003 readers
1490 users here now
Welcome to [email protected], where you can share and converse about the different things happening all over/about the United States.
If you’re interested in participating, please subscribe.
Rules
Be respectful and civil. No racism/bigotry/hateful speech.
Post anything related to the United States.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Of course there is a difference. The Democrats are a lesser evil by a pretty large margin, I don't dispute that. The point I'm making is that your constant chastisement of anyone who criticizes the Democrats from the left is counter-productive and betrays a deep insecurity in the merits of the party. When a party is unable to withstand criticism from its own base that's a problem with the party, not the base. You can blame voters all you want for the Democrats' loss, but it won't fix the problems the party has that led to this outcome. Criticism - and more importantly an adequate response to that criticism from the party itself - is necessary if the party is ever to recover.
FUD exists as a strategy because it works. All you have to do is criticize to sow apathy and reduce voter turnout.
Yes, the thing about FUD is you can't stop it, and by fighting it you only make it worse, especially when there are legitimate reasons to doubt. The best response to FUD is to make the criticism look stupid by proving it wrong with action. Trying to shut down criticism makes you look weak, and makes the criticism seem more valid, even when it isn't.
That doesn’t work in this scenario because democrats need more than the trans community to win elections. So they have to also win over voters that are anti trans.
And there it is. Let me ask you, how exactly do you think the Democrats should appeal to "anti-trans voters" without losing the trans and trans ally vote?
There’s no easy answer to that but until the trans community and their allies have a voting majority, it is a requirement that democrats appeal to both.
You're right that the answer isn't easy, but there is one and the Democrats have known it for some time, they're just not willing to do it. First, look at the driving force of anti-trans sentiment. It's economics. Trump and the like redirect the righteous anger people feel about their economic situation towards minorities by creating a narrative that is easy to understand and plays into pre-existing prejudices. The Democrats could do the same thing but direct the anger towards the wealthy instead of minorities. People have pre-existing prejudices towards "elites," and the narrative that the wealthy are the cause of your suffering has the advantage of being true. If the Democrats did this it wouldn't matter if they also go to bat for the trans community, because the average "anti-trans voter" doesn't actually care that much about trans issues, but are rather using the trans community as a stand-in to recieve their anger in the absence of a more compelling narrative.
Yeah, no. Economics isnt the driving force behind the anti-trans sentiment. That’s ridiculous
It's tied in to the broad cultural narrative that Republicans create and reinforce through their media, which is designed for the purpose of transforming economic anxiety into anger at minorities. The trans community can be said to be collateral, since the Republicans don't directly (keyword here) blame them for the state of the economy, but they represent the perception of "elites" who are culturally strange and different. The entire conservative narrative is about making the economic cultural. Bigotry is deliberately fueled by displaced anger. The anger must come from somewhere.