this post was submitted on 08 Jul 2023
56 points (96.7% liked)

Fediverse

28493 readers
649 users here now

A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, KBin, etc).

If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to [email protected]!

Rules

Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration), Search Lemmy

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I looked up a list of Lemmy World instances and signed up for a bunch, but how do I see everything at once in one app instead of downloading one for each instance? I am new to what the kids call "federation." Thank you.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] krayj 3 points 1 year ago (11 children)

You only need to sign up for one instance.

It would be so nice if this were true.

You need to sign up with every instance that isn't federated with an instance you've already signed up for.

So, for example, if you have a Lemmy.world account, and you want to subscribe and post to a community hosted by beehaw.org, you also need to create and maintain a beehaw.org account.

As the fediverse gets more mature, news of de-federation between big/popular instances becomes more common.

[–] emcon_delta 20 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (8 children)

That's beehaw's problem. They defederated with lemmy.world recently

[–] Zoldyck 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Why? Doesn't that undermine the whole strength of the Fediverse?

[–] emcon_delta 4 points 1 year ago

Not really. If the admins of that instance don't want to federated, that's their prerogative. They'll gain or lose users based on that decision. The beauty of the fediverse is that it's all on a voluntary basis. If beehaw decides to federate with a small cluster of other instances, then they'll have their own niche just like the current internet.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)