this post was submitted on 26 Nov 2024
11 points (92.3% liked)

micro-blog-[ish]

36 readers
18 users here now

A place to say what you have to say, without requiring any context, theme, arguments, or ceremony. Be civil.

founded 4 weeks ago
MODERATORS
 

I'm sure part of it is that open-source hardware in general is "harder" to do than software, but perhaps there is something more to it... such as people generally not wanting to invest time creating a more-crappy version of a black box that already does it's thing well enough. Perhaps it is only after printers get significantly worse or more annoying that people will start investing their own time creating alternative firmware/hardware.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

It probably hasn't caught on because when it comes to consumer inkjets it isn't the printer that's the expensive bit. Compare to 3d printers where the medium is fairly cheap and reasonably interchangeable. And if not inkjet then laser, and laser toner is really nasty stuff to work with.

[–] Omgpwnies 3 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

Tank style printers would probably be the way to go for ink, since the print head is not a 'consumable' part. For laser, maybe pick a popular proprietary toner cart and design around that?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago

Yeah, though I guess my point is if you don't have open ink, you probably don't have open printers.