this post was submitted on 14 Nov 2024
20 points (91.7% liked)
Apple
638 readers
9 users here now
There are a couple of community rules in addition to the main instance rules.
All posts must be about Apple
Anything goes as long as it’s about Apple. News about other companies and devices is allowed if it directly relates to Apple.
No NSFW content
While lemmy.zip allows NSFW content this community is intended to be a place for all to feel welcome. Any NSFW content will be removed and the user banned.
If you have any comments or suggestions please message one of the moderators.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
That is only true if other apps have the same operating system access as iCloud. If others apps can't perform the same actions because of vendor lock in, that's anticompetitive monopolistic behavior. Apple already failed to dismiss identical lawsuit in US, so the lawsuit is at least valid on its face.
What can’t you do on Dropbox that you can do with iCloud?
Dropbox seems to behave the same in Finder; you can add tags, organise, etc.
Isn't Finder a macOS app? Lawsuit is only about iOS.
Sorry I didn’t actually read it.
Yes Finder is the macOS analogue of the iOS Files app. As far as I can see Dropbox and Files are pretty similar too. iOS Dropbox lacks tags, though.
Sounds like Which‘s beef is with photo syncing. They think that the Photos app should be able to sync with clouds other than iCloud..?
Issue is that 3rd party apps doesn't have the same system access as iCloud. So you can't use any other cloud the same way you can iCloud. So by definition that's anticompetitive, since you have no options.