this post was submitted on 11 Nov 2024
989 points (98.3% liked)

Programming Humor

2684 readers
1 users here now

Related Communities [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected]

Other Programming Communities [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected]

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 61 points 1 week ago (2 children)

It's usually actually the other way around in my experience

Anything that has the label "pro" or "enterprise" suuuuuucks, is badly designed, full of bugs.. take the open source app, and it just works

[–] BigDiction 19 points 1 week ago (1 children)

There’s just so much more opportunity for feedback, use case stories, and a variety of perspectives in open source development.

Good enterprise development does all those things as well, but there is always a bigger barrier to the user when you have to design behind a curtain.

[–] madcaesar 19 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I'm pretty sure it's not lack of user feedback. It's MBAs deciding the user is wrong and unprofitable, therefore better add more tracking and ads.

[–] namarupa 4 points 1 week ago

Exactly. These companies have more feedback than they could ever parse. They only listen if said feedback results in loss of profit.

[–] CtrlAltDyeet 3 points 1 week ago

Yup, and not just ads. At one of my jobs at a SECURITY company the bugs are considered a liability. Features were prioritised, vulnerabilities be damned.

After that experience I doubt most proprietary software is more secure than open source

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

Corporate apps do tend to have game breaking bugs fixed sooner, while some open source apps just don't