this post was submitted on 16 Jul 2023
77 points (86.7% liked)
Asklemmy
43974 readers
580 users here now
A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions
If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!
- Open-ended question
- Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
- Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
- Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
- An actual topic of discussion
Looking for support?
Looking for a community?
- Lemmyverse: community search
- sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
- [email protected]: a community for finding communities
~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
They should be allowed to restrict their donation, but I think the health service should be allowed to overrule this necessary (if you’re the only compatible donor or something, idk how this stuff works).
Maybe don’t make it very obvious that this possibility exists so people will donate thinking their restriction is final. After all, what are they gonna do about it after their dead?
This is the only opinion so far that I completely disagree with. I don't think a system that is trying to get people to volunteraly donate their organs should be allowed to lie to donors.
Yeah I understand completely honestly.
Though I don’t mind lying to assholes who will only donate their organs to specific groups of people, the backlash and lack of trust this could cause could have disastrous effects.
I didn’t really think this through.