62
this post was submitted on 12 Jul 2023
62 points (97.0% liked)
Technology
34404 readers
488 users here now
This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.
Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.
Rules:
1: All Lemmy rules apply
2: Do not post low effort posts
3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff
4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.
5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)
6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist
7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I hate this sentence with a burning passion for two reasons.
Firstly its position on an article like this implies that SETI@home not finding anything is a failing of distributed computing, but they could have run that code on a supercomputer and still not found anything.
But more importantly it speaks to a big misunderstanding of science that is not only ubiquitous among the general public, but is also common among funders of science and even scientists themselves. Science isn't about discoveries, it's about investigation. Don't get me wrong, discovering something new is amazing and it's what we would all want even if our funding didn't hinge on it, but the fact that SETI haven't found anything is still an important result and not a failure. I genuinely think this focus on discoveries will be the downfall of modern science if we're not careful, it means that important things like the sustainability of scientific software or reproducibility of research are being left by the wayside because they don't lead directly to discoveries.
Sorry, went off on a massive tangent there...
@seamsay
True, if you see nothing, this is still something to study and to acknowledge.
Too many paper are not published today because they don't give result, which means a lot of experiments are done again and again because nobody though of publishing that it does'mt work.
@makeasnek