this post was submitted on 14 Jun 2024
181 points (98.9% liked)

Firefox

18116 readers
54 users here now

A place to discuss the news and latest developments on the open-source browser Firefox

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 70 points 6 months ago (22 children)

Sad to see they only use MS GitHub instead of selfhosting something like GitLab. Just another vendor lock-in.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 6 months ago (15 children)

Honest question - is GitLab really that different of a vendor lock-in over GitHub?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 6 months ago (5 children)

It absolutely is. Yes. You can run and maintain it on an own server and it is open core (yeah 😥) using the MIT license - unlike GitHub where you have to rely 100% on the goodwill of Microsoft and everything is closed and locked behind a TOS.

[–] Lemzlez 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

So why not use forejo, which is completely open source?

If your criticism is MS pulling the plug, then Gitlab pulling a Redis/Hashicorp move and re-licensing their core should also be a concern

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

So why not use forejo, which is completely open source?

Absolutely! I’d always go the Forgejo route!

The thing is: I don’t see Firefox being hosted with Forgejo. The code base and amount of data might be way too massive. I see Forgejo as a forge for smaller projects.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Is there a reason you think Forgejo is only for smaller projects?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I've never seen larger projects like Firefox hosted with Forgejo.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago

Probably because it has only existed for 2 years

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)
load more comments (18 replies)