Asklemmy

44283 readers

1233 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
[email protected]: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

252

What kinds of things from reddit would you like to see Lemmy avoid as the user base grows? (lemmy.fmhy.ml)

submitted 2 years ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

434 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Personally I think not having karma limits is nice currently! I understand why they were used but grinding karma as a lurker on reddit was frustrating.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] -2 points 2 years ago (5 children)

@gronapa
I wish there was multidimensional voting, and a way to filter out downvotes from people you don't align with. Minority opinions matter, but then getting downvoted to oblivion because the majority doesn't agree is damaging. It tends to lead to lowest common denominator content or proven reposts.

[–] Sleuth 6 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (3 children)

No, I have to disagree. That would lead to echo chambers worse than even the worst of subs on Reddit.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I've read it as a way to counteract echo chambers.

Assuming votes influence what opinions people voice, minority opinions have a hard time. Which can lead to them being underrepresented, and the vicious circle towards echo chamber has started.

If the minority opinion poster can make themselves more comfortable, how would that (also) lead to echo chambers?

[–] Sleuth 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Is hiding dissenting views truly a way to make yourself more comfortable? Sure, maybe more comfortable in your beliefs, but no one should be entirely comfortable in their opinions. It gives a false sense of valediction, like the entire world believes in you, when in reality an argument could completely fall apart if challenged outside of that space.

Upvotes and downvotes don't really matter in the end. You can always find groups of people who agree or disagree with you. However, hiding opposing views doesn't make you or an opinion more valid. While it could counteract echo chambers, I personally don't see how it wouldn't make the problem worse.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

Is hiding dissenting views truly a way to make yourself more comfortable?

In a very blunt sense: Yes. We all do that. Most people surround themselves with friends who like who you are, not with enemies who hate who you are.

no one should be entirely comfortable in their opinions. It gives a false sense of valediction, like the entire world believes in you, when in reality an argument could completely fall apart if challenged outside of that space.

It seems we both value pluralism, and see echo chambers as a bad thing. I haven't understood yet how you meant hiding votes (not opinions) would lead to echo chambers. Could you explain that?

Or were you talking about hiding views, when I read the proposal as hiding votes?

load more comments (1 replies)