Hardware

1121 readers
181 users here now

All things related to technology hardware, with a focus on computing hardware.


Rules (Click to Expand):

  1. Follow the Lemmy.world Rules - https://mastodon.world/about

  2. Be kind. No bullying, harassment, racism, sexism etc. against other users.

  3. No Spam, illegal content, or NSFW content.

  4. Please stay on topic, adjacent topics (e.g. software) are fine if they are strongly relevant to technology hardware. Another example would be business news for hardware-focused companies.

  5. Please try and post original sources when possible (as opposed to summaries).

  6. If posting an archived version of the article, please include a URL link to the original article in the body of the post.


Some other hardware communities across Lemmy:

Icon by "icon lauk" under CC BY 3.0

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
976
977
 
 

Source Bloomberg article

Missing intro text from Archived link:

Apple Inc. is exploring a push into smart glasses with an internal study of products currently on the market, setting the stage for the company to follow Meta Platforms Inc. into an increasingly popular category.

The initiative, code-named Atlas, got underway last week and involves gathering feedback from Apple employees on smart glasses, according to people with knowledge of the matter. Additional focus groups are planned for the near future, said the people, who asked not to be identified because the work is secret. The studies are being led by Apple’s Product Systems Quality team, part of the hardware engineering division.

978
979
980
981
982
983
984
24
submitted 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) by [email protected] to c/hardware
985
986
 
 

Not great for either party, but imo a particularly bad look for Intel. If they actually end up missing out on those subsidies (and imo it looks that way), then to me that puts a very big questionmark behind their whole fab business.

Even if Germany doesn't offer the ideal conditions, getting 1/3 of a fab for free looks like a good deal to me. Advanced nodes are getting more and more capital intensive.

TSMC has a huge customer base (particularly Apple) to fund R&D. And the more capacity you have (assuming you can untilize it) the more you can spread out those investment costs.

Intel so far has to shoulder those costs all by themselves. I know they are opening up to outside customers, but those still have to be aquired first and also convinced that there is no conflict of interest. So willingly leaving such a huge chunk on money on the wayside in their situation looks like a bad move. Unless ofc they simply can't afford the rest, but that would be even worse.

987
988
989
990
991
992
993
994
995
996
997
998
999
1000
view more: ‹ prev next ›