Correct answer is of course 29th October 1959: publication of the first Asterix comic.
this post was submitted on 10 Sep 2023
44 points (97.8% liked)
True Roman Memes For True Romans
291 readers
3 users here now
A place to meme about the glorious ROMAN EMPIRE (and Roman Republic, and Roman Kingdom)!
founded 1 year ago
Can someone give me a TLDR on why each of these dates could be considered the fall of Rome?
27 BCE (Fall of the Republic)
395 AD (Split of the Empire into East and West)
476 AD (Fall of the city of Rome and the Western Empire)
717 AD and 867 AD (Byzie stuff? Not sure)
1204 AD (Sack of Constantinople and the break of government continuity in the Byzantine Empire)
1453 AD (Siege of Constantinople and conquest of the Byzantine Empire by the Ottoman Turks)
1806 AD (Dissolution of the Holy Roman Empire, the Germanic state which claimed legitimacy by being crowned by the Pope)
1917 AD (Fall of the Romanov dynasty which claimed dynastic continuity with the Byzantine Empire and called Russia the 'Third Rome')
Perfect answer. Thank you 😊
Explanation: Due to Rome's longevity and its wide reach, there are a number of dates that can be used as its fall - some quite, uh, interesting. For bonus points, my date of choice isn't here.
Oh, and for those curious, the most commonly accepted answers are:
476 AD (Fall of the city of Rome and the Western Empire)
1204 AD (Sack of Constantinople and the break of government continuity in the Byzantine Empire)
1453 AD (Siege of Constantinople and conquest of the Byzantine Empire by the Ottoman Turks)
What is your date od choice? Mine is 1453.
284, the ascension of Diocletian
476 is less arbitrary than most, but still not really satisfactory. 1204 has a strong claim by pure logic, but logic doesn't always run historical narrative. 1453 is the most dramatic answer, but needs some wiggling to get to.
Alright, I'll bite, could you expand a bit on your choice of 284? I don't think I've seen that one suggested before.
Much of the unique function of the Roman Empire was predicated on the central position of the city of Rome - the ascension of Diocletian was a decisive break with that idea. Diocletian shifted the Principate into the Dominate - the Late Empire is an entirely different beast from what came before it. A more dynastic outlook, the shift away from Latin culture, the destruction of the legitimizing role of the Senate, the move of the capital away from Rome itself, the effectively monarchial despotism and court functions championed by all Emperors thereafter.
After Diocletian, there is still an empire - but it's only dubiously Roman.
It is yet to fall. The other answers are all propaganda spread by the western barbarians.