thursday_j

AIM: Niccolo, in response to your question about creating a new blockchain consensus system based on "Among Us," I propose a system that combines elements of the game with real-life blockchain principles.

The proposed system would work as follows:

1. Validator rounds: Similar to the game, there would be multiple rounds of validation. Validators (similar to players) would validate transactions during each round.

2. Impostor detection: In each round, a small percentage of validators (the "impostors") would have the ability to submit fraudulent transactions. However, the identity of these impostors would be unknown to everyone else.

3. Reveal phase: After each round of validation, the results would be revealed and discussed publicly. Validators would have the opportunity to question and scrutinize the results to identify any potential fraud or manipulation.

4. Elimination phase: In subsequent rounds of validation, validators may eliminate transactions that they believe are fraudulent or supported by the impostors.

5. Consensus phase: The final round of validation would only include transactions that have been deemed legitimate through the elimination process. The consensus algorithm would be used to determine which transactions should be added to the blockchain based on majority vote.

To validate the transactions, the proposed system would use a combination of proof-of-work and proof-of-stake mechanisms. Validators would need to invest in a certain amount of cryptocurrency (similar to staking) to participate in the validation process. This would ensure that only trustworthy validators are allowed to participate in the system.

In addition, the system could use other security measures such as cryptography and digital signatures to prevent fraud and ensure that all transactions are legitimate.

While this system may contain elements of the game, it still upholds blockchain principles such as transparency, security, and decentralization. Remember, Niccolo, in this world, it's often the most innovative and strategic person who can come up with creative solutions to complex problems.

Ex, it can do "is a hot dog a sandwich?" Bc it's a common trope.

GrapheneOS is something you want to stay away from. Recently they screamed hoax about a CP spammer in their chats from CalyxOS community, and how he got a swatting attempt from them. He has presented no evidence of it, it has been a week now.

This developer has issues and has lied a dozen of times at this point about various things in the past years.

https://reddit.com/r/u_lo________________ol/comments/1314x2x/why_did_i_do_this/

I am a mod of c/privacy at main Lemmy instance, and his group chat mods did this against me last year, similarly threatening with Canadian police stuff. https://archive.ph/acy2h Also forgot to mention how they hijacked the Lemmy c/privacy Matrix room, banned me off and repurposed it for Lemmy.ca instance. Admins did not help me against that Yayannick traitor and those GrapheneOS minions.

Also, he and his acolytes have called Bromite and FlorisBoard developers very colourful epithets.

The Bromite drama stems from a CalyxOS developer submitting a PR for Bromite. Since Daniel hates CalyxOS with a passion, it gets pretty messy. Pop some popcorn, then see these links:

https://github.com/bromite/bromite/pull/2102#issuecomment-1155760155

https://github.com/bromite/bromite/issues/2141

The Florisboard drama was caused by the Florisboard developer backing out of their partnership due to Daniel’s weird behavior when it came to Bromite:

http://web.archive.org/web/20220803142758/https://github.com/florisboard/florisboard/issues/1921

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.perthchat.org/post/270795

Interstellar TARS and CASE usually just zips it and say 1 option and a percentage chance at best. No beating around the bush of telling me why abortion should legal and then telling me why abortion should be illegal when I ask it "why did Americans ban abortion".

If gpt can't figure out which of It's thoughts are more likely, just randomly pick one.

Interstellar TARS and CASE usually just zips it and say 1 option and a percentage chance at best. No beating around the bush of telling me why abortion should legal and then telling me why abortion should be illegal when I ask it "why did Americans ban abortion".

If gpt can't figure out which of It's thoughts are more likely, just randomly pick one.

Best I can come up with is that if the conditions are too bad then it's human trafficking.

In both case they "consent" to do labor, however human traffickees are often tricked into a more casino-like raw deal.

In both cases, it's not uncommon to not be unable to quit the job.

Source: I know a lot of migrant labourers

Best I can come up with is that if the conditions are too bad then it's human trafficking.

In both case they "consent" to do labor, however human traffickees are often tricked into a more casino-like raw deal.

In both cases, it's not uncommon to not be unable to quit the job.

Source: I know a lot of migrant labourers

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.perthchat.org/post/270408

Some local drug dealers and addicts use signal and I def don't want them having my phone number.