mrginger

joined 1 year ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] mrginger 23 points 1 month ago

Because that would be fucking weird.

[–] mrginger 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

This is who will get replaced first, and they don't want to see it. They're the most important, valuable part of the company in their own mind, yet that was the one thing the AI got right, the management part. It still needed the creative mind of a human programmer to do the code properly, or think outside the box.

[–] mrginger 10 points 1 year ago

There were still bugs. You just learned how to deal with them or work around them.

[–] mrginger 161 points 1 year ago (92 children)

Ban abortions, then starve the children. If wasn't already apparent that the Republican Party is evil, this should make things much clearer.

[–] mrginger 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They'll just make a fee for having to list their fees, and make the consumer pay for it.

[–] mrginger 21 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Because selling the notion of "trickle down" economics is extremely profitable for those at the top. It keeps stringing people along believing that if we just give more money to and ask for less from our corporate benefactors, eventually we'll all benefit somehow by them expanding their businesses and creating more slave wage jobs.

[–] mrginger 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children)

Continuing with the real-estate discussion (I know, now I'm focusing on it ;-) ), I whole heartedly disagree. When ignoring the needs of the lower 75% of the country's wage earners, and focusing your efforts on the upper 25%, something is glaringly, obviously wrong, and saying things like,

It doesn’t matter who they’re targeting, because they’re increasing supply.

shows a level of privilege that most people in the US cannot fathom or afford, myself included. That statement says...a lot, but I don't want to devolve into ad hominin bs because now you've piqued my interest.

Honestly, and I genuinely mean this, yes, I would love to know what a climate lobbyist does.

I know tone doesn't translate via text very well, but I can assure you I'm not desperate to have all lobbyists be inherently bad. Am I angry? Yes, but never desperate, and I'm not angry without reason. I've seen it directly, more than once in my lifetime, politicians and policy be influenced by the efforts of lobbyists and their money. Not just something I read in the news, heard on the radio, or saw on a website. I've seen funding pulled from one project to another because of lobbyists. Not because the project the funding was being pulled from wasn't worthy, but our lobbyists weren't as good (or willing to donate as much) as their lobbyists.

It's a system that allows to much room for abuse, is abused every single day. Even if for something as noble as a climate lobbyist, the quote "The road to hell is paved with good intentions." I would think still rings true (religious connotations notwithstanding).

Now don't ask me how to fix it all because I have no clue. Maybe it's the best we have. I dunno. 😂 I just choose, like I said earlier never to trust a politician. They're all owned in some way by the money that puts them in power.

Edit: I do want to say, I am enjoying this discussion. Thank you for making a long day at the office a little bit more interesting.

[–] mrginger 0 points 1 year ago (7 children)

Yes I do. None of them are selling affordable single family homes.

As a matter of fact multi-family housing is leading a housing construction "boom" as of articles published 6 days ago.

Here's a quote from MReport:

Further, almost two-thirds of the apartments build during the pandemic are clustered in just 20 high-growth metropolitan areas, which make up about 41% of the total renter population in the U.S. Therefore, for many other places, the new supply barely made a dent in the existing supply. What's more, around 89% of the apartments completed in the last three years are high-end and, thus, target upper-middle- and high-income buyers and renters.

So they are building "multi-family homes", but targeting, wait for it, people with lot's of money.

So you quit lying.

Come to think of it, you're singling out the and focusing on the real estate angle pretty hard. Why is that?

[–] mrginger 3 points 1 year ago (9 children)

You're joking right? https://www.statista.com/statistics/257364/top-lobbying-industries-in-the-us/

From your own source. https://www.opensecrets.org/news/2023/02/oil-and-gas-industry-spent-124-4-million-on-federal-lobbying-amid-record-profits-in-2022/#:~:text=The%20oil%20and%20gas%20industry,slightly%20when%20adjusted%20for%20inflation.

And for you last point about NAR, I have doubts. I could see home builders and home buyers benefitting from zoning changes. It would drive down costs of a new home, open up more choices for home buyers, and put construction companies to work. Realtors are middle men who work off commissions. The more they can sell a house for the more commission they make. Realtors have a vested interest keeping the market balanced in their favor.

[–] mrginger 4 points 1 year ago (11 children)

Take one look at who the biggest lobbyists in the US are. Then compare that to the most glaring issues we have in the US. I'll wait.

[–] mrginger 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Now that's a thought. An unwitting corrupt politician honey pot.

 

Me personally, I've been buying up some generics and eagles.

view more: next ›