So what electoral system do you propose? One-mandate districts? Using sorting elect. mothod and than take the first n candidates? STV?
Also note that for bicameral solution it's good to use different methods.
So what electoral system do you propose? One-mandate districts? Using sorting elect. mothod and than take the first n candidates? STV?
Also note that for bicameral solution it's good to use different methods.
The abstract things is what I used to enjoy the most. But I shall think about your advice, thank you.
In terms of sci-fi, I've got The War of the Worlds on list.
It's good solution how to "read" while doing some manual chore, like cooking.
However, I don't do it, but I think it's worthy of a try.
How do you feel about audiobooks?
I have to finish the bachelor (remains one year) to maintain free education, and then... maybe. Anyway, thanks for encouraging.
Maths. It's my field of study and I'm reasonably good at it, but I'm no more able to find joy in a nice definition etc. It's just boring.
Even if I study some out-of-syllabus topic I know that is interesting, it doesn't interest me.
Wish you good luck (or not needing to be lucky).
I got back into reading (after ~ half year pause).
What happened in Pyrenees/South Occitania? Is Andorra OK?
To get the data, search "frequency list (of English)".
How would be such a debate of ten milliards of people moderated? Who would decide, that today, we shall vote about the water, and tomorrow, about some boring technical norms of street lights? If you have an answer, how would be this solution resistant to a misuse?
Would we haveanything like a constitution? And how would be principles of subsidarity achieved?