coffeewithalex

I wasn't replying to anything that mentioned color.

Yes. The word "color" is mentioned exactly 0 times in the ancestor nodes above my comment.

You make it seem like the race matters in this incident. As if a black person killed is different from a pink person killed. You have preferential treatment of problems based on skin color. That is racist.

Well OK yeah, for those you just need B&W. Color becomes useful when trying to impress. I've sent rent applications in color specifically because I know that the real estate agents are subjective. Some of the talks that I've held were helped out by coloring my notes while I was presenting. And some home crafts and activities (escape rooms with friends) were helped out several times by the color printer. Given that there isn't a huge price gap in maintenance and initial costs, for me it was worth it.

Also, neither the OP nor the comment I was replying to mentioned anything about color. I was specifying stuff about printers in general.

Shipping labels, concert tickets, sometimes train tickets and airline tickets (some companies don't accept them just on the phone), contracts, NDAs, tax returns, etc.

Depends on where you live and how much you interact with other companies and government agencies.

And this was not the first ~~black~~ person to be murdered in France by the police like this.

ok racist.

Pattern? What pattern? Do you have any public data to go with that statement, that shows a problem SO BIG with authorities that it justifies violence? In the last years, 15 people have been killed by police in such incidents. 8 police officers have been charged. Without knowing the details about the rest, how can you claim that it's a systemic problem? You know what a systemic problem looks like? More than 2000 people were killed BY cars in the same period. THAT's a systemic problem. For the scale of this problem however, peaceful protests calling for transparency in these cases, and other constructive demands, should be the reaction, and not this. This? This just shows that France is dealing with violence and gives many people the impression that it's OK if police sometimes kill such violent people. I literally had this conversation with the other side, who tried to convince me that the rioters should be shot or something. 17 year old broke the law driving the vehicle, and recklessly tried to speed away from this. The police officer over-reacted (cars do kill people quite a lot) and should be investigated for manslaughter, but what should not happen is this. Why is it so hard to see? Why are y'all so trigger happy? Maybe because it's not your house that was attacked and your family injured? Maybe because it's not your neighbourhood which got trashed and your business looted?

So if I abhor violence and people getting hurt, suddenly I'm a "capitalist shill".

Speaks volumes of your intellect, I must say

There were no protests. No lawsuits, no nothing. Straight to violence.

And people here actually believe that it's good to hurt other people, as if that fixes the death of one person. Horrible in every way. Shameful and disgusting.

Blend it. Yeah it might result in an unpredictable result as I haven't tuned the grinder settings for it, but it's still good.

We have far more complex systems than 15 years ago. Complexity has skyrocketed because of human failures in designing optimal, elegant systems, but also because of premature optimisation, convenience, and security.

To top it all off, literacy in computers hasn't necessarily increased for the median user.

But if 15 years ago computers had to be regularly restarted, Windows had notoriously frequent Blue Screen of Death, Linux was not really feasible as a desktop system for most people, today we're doing much better.

curry36 is the best gourmet experience you can have